Feminist Ethics aims “to understand, criticize, and correct” how gender operates within our moral beliefs and practices (Lindemann 2005, 11) and our methodological approaches to ethical theory.
What elements of the moral life does feminist ethics emphasize?
Given this critique of utilitarian and Kantian ethics, it is unsurprising, then, that feminist ethicists have developed different perspectives, focusing on: care as well as (or instead of) justice. the need to develop ethical attitudes such as empathy & affection; emphasis on terms like dependence and responsibility.
Why is feminist ethics important explain?
A feminist ethic, which paid attention to these different identities and perspectives, became centrally important to taking women’s lives and experiences seriously, and central to eliminating oppression of women, sexual minorities, and other oppressed groups.
Is feminist ethics a rigorous moral theory?
Feminist ethics is a rigorous moral theory. There is a general agreement among ethicists that a gap exists between the moral thinking styles of men and women.
What is feminist care ethics?
A feminist ethic of care is an ethic of resistance to the injustices inherent in patriarchy (the association of care and caring with women rather than with humans, the feminization of care work, the rendering of care as subsidiary to justice—a matter of special obligations or interpersonal relationships).
How is feminist ethics different to virtue ethics?
Feminist ethics addresses the subordination in society of women and women’s interests to men and men’s interests and the devaluation or exclusion in moral philosophy of women’s perspectives. … In so doing, they enrich feminist ethics and broaden, reorient, and improve virtue ethics.
What is feminist ethics Hilde Lindemann summary?
What Is Feminist Ethics? … She first discusses the nature of feminism and identifies some of the various ways that people have defined it. Lindemann argues against thinking of feminism as focused primarily on equality, women, or the differences between the sexes.
What role do emotions play in feminist ethics?
First, some feminists emphasize the role of emotion in action; in particular, they stress the motive of care in prompting action. They do so for the reason that emotion in general, and care in particular, have been ignored or denigrated in traditional moral theory due to their association with women.
What is the attitude of feminist ethics toward moral principles compare it with Kant’s view?
How does feminist ethics differ from Kantian ethics? Feminists ethics is not a moral theory so much as an alternative way of looking at the concepts and concerns of the moral life. It’s an approach focused on women’s interests and experiences and devoted to supporting the moral equality of women and men.
Why does feminist theory reject traditional ethical theory quizlet?
Feminist ethics rejects the unification of ethics under a supreme moral principle. Morality is complicated and messy. Feminists also often oppose the impartiality and abstraction that characterize traditional ethical theories. They value partiality (to loved ones) and attention to the particulars of situations.
According to the text, which author allowed feminist ethics to “come into its own”? a. John Stuart Mill.
Gender equitable societies are healthier for everyone. As feminism challenges restrictive gender norms, improvements in women’s access to health care, reproductive rights, and protection from violence have positive effects on everyone’s life expectancy and well-being, especially children.
What is an ethics of care according to Virginia held?
How would you define ethics of care? It is a new approach to morality based on the experience of caring and being cared for and reflection on the values involved. It is both a moral theory and theorizing about practices of care.
What do moral relativists believe about morality?
Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others.